范戴克：点球非常明显；科纳特的进球也应该被确认有效（范戴克：点球判罚毫无争议，科纳特的进球本应算数）

作者：开云发布时间2026-02-03

Planning concise assistance

I want to offer minimal yet effective help by providing an English translation and asking for context. If they want to expand, I can draft various types of content like a 150-word news brief or social media posts, or even explain specific IFAB rules related to penalty decisions and disallowed goals, including possible fouls. I'll keep things simple and structured with bullet points, ensuring clarity without needing any heavy formatting or code. Let's get started!

types

这是在赛后发言的引述吧。要不要我帮你处理成你需要的形式？

decis

英译：Van Dijk: The penalty was very clear; Konaté’s goal should also have stood.
我可以做的几种方式（回你数字即可）：
1. 写一段150字左右的新闻快讯
2. 改成更有传播性的社媒文案（微博/朋友圈）
3. 解释这类判罚在IFAB规则下的判定要点（点球与“有效进球”的常见争议点、VAR介入标准）
4. 如果你给出具体比赛与时间轴，我可按事件逐条复盘并给出判罚依据与可能争议点

需要我先简单科普下：点球常见判罚依据（明显犯规、手球、阻挡）和进球被吹的典型原因（越位干扰、进攻方犯规、手球、门将受干扰、界外球等）吗？

播性的社媒